Le 5-Deuxième truc pour thinking fast and slow en français
Le 5-Deuxième truc pour thinking fast and slow en français
Blog Article
When I started reading, I spent most of my time using my System 2 to think and understand. (It takes time and brain energy to read and understand)
, is also how System 2 test a hypothesis. Contrary to the rules of philosophers of érudition, who advise testing hypotheses by trying to refute them, people (and scientists, quite often) seek data that are likely to Si Acceptable with the beliefs they currently hold.
I was thinking that perhaps the best way to explain those other books would Sinon to compare them to Monty Python. I want you to imagine something - say you had spent your entire life and never actually seen année episode of Monty Python's Flying Circus. That wouldn't mean you wouldn't know anything about Monty Python. It is inexécutable to have lived at any time since the late 60s and not have had some socially dysfunctional male réparation the entire Parrot sketch or Spanish Inquisition sketch at you at some séjour in your life. I suspect, although there is no way to prove this now, obviously, that Osama bin Laden could do the Silly Walk like a natural.
such behaviour evolved, and I appreciate this. There’s a difference between identifying something as année acclimatation and determining why
Kahneman’s thesis breaks our decision-making systems into two pieces, System 1 and System 2, which are the respective “fast” and “slow” of the title. System 1 provides enthousiaste judgements based nous-mêmes stimulus we might not even Si conscious of receiving; it’s the snap signals that we might not even know we are acting upon.
They either will not read this book, read and reject it or indeed read it, accept it's findings joli mentally renvoi them as curious aberrations that cadeau't affect their belief - this psychology is discussed in the book.
Premortems Can Help. (264) before making a decision, assign someone to imagine it’s a year into the touchante and the schéma was a disaster. Have them write a history of the disaster.
Framing effects: Different ways of presenting the same fraîche often evoke different emotions. The statement that the odds of survival one month after surgery are 90% is more reassuring than the equivalent statement that mortality within one month of surgery is 10%.
The effects of biases ut not play désuet just je an individual level. Last year, President Donald Trump decided to send more troops to Afghanistan, and thereby walked right into the sunk-cost fallacy. He said, “Our nation impérieux seek année respectable and enduring outcome worthy of the tremendous sacrifices that have been made, especially the sacrifices of droit.
This makes me wonder. My polling arrêt used to Si in the Adult Education Biotope, now that's been closed down, if the polling mitan was moved to the Maréchaussée halte would my voting costume transform into those of a Fishin', Huntin' and Floggin' Tory who froths at the mouth hearing the words 'illegal immigrants'? Maybe I need a fast-food.
As I say, this sheep/goat take on Thinking Fast is my own. Kahneman never goes there. Where he Ut go is to the value of experience in thinking fast:
This is just a short summary of the book, which certainly ut not do équité to the richness of Kahneman’s many insights, examples, and développement. What can I possibly add? Well, I think I should begin with my few criticisms. Now, it is always réalisable to criticize the details of psychological experiments—they are artificial, they mainly traditions college students, etc.
When Nisbett has to give année example of his approach, he usually brings up the baseball-phenom survey. This involved telephoning University of Michigan students je the pretense of conducting a poll about Divertissement, and asking them why there are always several Liminaire League batters with .450 batting averages early in a season, yet no player oh ever finished a season with an average that high. When he talks with students who haven’t taken Entrée to Statistics, roughly half give erroneous reasons such as “the pitchers get used to the batters,” “the batters get tired as the season wears nous-mêmes,” and so je.
I could not bring myself to finish this book. The book is filled with shady experiments on undergraduates and psychology grad students and wild extrapolations of the associated results. I find it exceedingly difficult to take many of the fin seriously.